Ubuntu
python3.3 package

  1. Bug #1131183
  2. Comment #3

Comment 3 for bug 1131183

Revision history for this message
Jason Gerard DeRose (jderose) wrote :

That above bit in debian/rules seems unneeded, and was probably not the correct fix to whatever issue there was with os.fsync() not being defined.

Before the sed bit, there is:

#define HAVE_FSYNC 1
#define HAVE_SYNC 1

And after you end up with HAVE_FSYNC being defined twice:

#define HAVE_FSYNC 1
#define HAVE_FSYNC 1