Jonathan Marsden [2009-12-07 17:39 -0000]:
> Martin, Thanks so much for looking at this. I noticed you used the
> command python, whereas was using the command python2.6 for my tests.
> Is the default Python in Lucid Python 3.0.x maybe?
No, it's 2.6.
> Just a guess at this point. It may be a silly mistake in my
> packaging, too! The Karmic one definitely works well for several
> end users...
Right, I didn't test the karmic update. I guess the karmic->lucid
packaging changed a bit. The python2.6 packaging is very weird and
uses a custom patch system. I think it's simply not applied on build.
Jonathan Marsden [2009-12-07 17:39 -0000]:
> Martin, Thanks so much for looking at this. I noticed you used the
> command python, whereas was using the command python2.6 for my tests.
> Is the default Python in Lucid Python 3.0.x maybe?
No, it's 2.6.
> Just a guess at this point. It may be a silly mistake in my
> packaging, too! The Karmic one definitely works well for several
> end users...
Right, I didn't test the karmic update. I guess the karmic->lucid
packaging changed a bit. The python2.6 packaging is very weird and
uses a custom patch system. I think it's simply not applied on build.