So this apparently is a fork of the 'rtslib' source package. It adds python3 support and seems to be packaged better. So that's OK.
It looks OK packaging wise. It calls update-alternatives --remove in the postrm script, which is bad [1], but since it also calls it in the prerm script, I think that's fine.
I'm not super thrilled with adding a redundant iSCSI option. But I understand your reasoning. Since this runs a daemon I'll ask the security team to take a look, and they can comment on how much they'd hate supporting two iSCSI solutions.
So this apparently is a fork of the 'rtslib' source package. It adds python3 support and seems to be packaged better. So that's OK.
It looks OK packaging wise. It calls update-alternatives --remove in the postrm script, which is bad [1], but since it also calls it in the prerm script, I think that's fine.
I'm not super thrilled with adding a redundant iSCSI option. But I understand your reasoning. Since this runs a daemon I'll ask the security team to take a look, and they can comment on how much they'd hate supporting two iSCSI solutions.
[1] https:/ /lintian. debian. org/tags/ maintainer- script- should- not-use- update- alternatives- remove. html