Comment 56 for bug 1640978

Revision history for this message
Robie Basak (racb) wrote : Re: [Bug 1640978] Re: [SRU] Backport letsencrypt 0.14.1

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:30:14PM -0000, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> The logic of the scripts seems sound to me. Do you want me to do the
> individual reviews of each branch as well in this case?

Could you review what I put in the branches, please? That is: that the
backport contents are suitable in your opinion, and that I haven't
missed anything that might make it inappropriate for SRU - IOW, would
you be happy to sponsor these?

I don't think it's necessary for you to review that the branches were in
fact produced by my script, so I think it'd be sufficient for you to
examine just my scripts.

Note though that there are two branches not produced by my scripts
xenial-transitional for python-certbot and python-certbot-apache
(python-letsencrypt-apache repo). Please check these look good to you
too.

Thanks!