On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:12:37PM -0000, houstonbofh wrote:
> I would not call this low urgency. Everyone will be getting this, and
> breaking the only way most know to fix it. A quick look at the dupes
> for 88104 will show how bad this is already. (and yes, one is mine...
> Doh!) Keep in mind that no one with this bug will see the update
> notifier announcing the fix.
No one has claimed it was not an urgent problem. In fact, I pushed in a
quick fix already because the impact of the bug was apparent as soon as I
encountered it.
There's nothing we can do about update-manager breaking as a result of this
bug, though; users affected by it will need to use apt-get to install the
fix. Unfortunately, this can happen from time to time here at the bleeding
edge of development.
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:12:37PM -0000, houstonbofh wrote:
> I would not call this low urgency. Everyone will be getting this, and
> breaking the only way most know to fix it. A quick look at the dupes
> for 88104 will show how bad this is already. (and yes, one is mine...
> Doh!) Keep in mind that no one with this bug will see the update
> notifier announcing the fix.
No one has claimed it was not an urgent problem. In fact, I pushed in a
quick fix already because the impact of the bug was apparent as soon as I
encountered it.
There's nothing we can do about update-manager breaking as a result of this
bug, though; users affected by it will need to use apt-get to install the
fix. Unfortunately, this can happen from time to time here at the bleeding
edge of development.
--
- mdz