On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 14:02:13 -0000, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> you to try building the package (without the workaround patch) against
> libssl instead of libgnutls? That might be a fairly-easy way to test the
(More precisely: libcurlX-openssl instead of libcurlX-gnutls.)
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 14:02:13 -0000, Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:
> you to try building the package (without the workaround patch) against
> libssl instead of libgnutls? That might be a fairly-easy way to test the
(More precisely: libcurlX-openssl instead of libcurlX-gnutls.)
Nathan