clutter-cairo has been deprecated upstream, but it 0.8.0 still exists in the Karmic archive. That's the whole point of why it has a task here:
andrew@andrew-laptop:~$ apt-cache policy libclutter-cairo-0.8-0 libclutter-cairo-0.8-0: Installed: (none) Candidate: 0.8.2-1 Version table: 0.8.2-1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/universe Packages
The question is, should it be removed from the archive? Are we going to keep libclutter-0.8-0? It's co-installable. But we've successfully transitioned all its reverse dependencies?
andrew@andrew-laptop:~$ apt-cache policy libclutter-0.8-0 libclutter-0.8-0 Reverse Depends: libclutter-cairo-0.8-0 libclutter-0.8-dev libclutter-0.8-dbg
MOTU-Release, any opinion on whether we should leave libclutter-cairo-0.8-0 and libclutter-0.8-0 around, or should I open removal requests on them?
clutter-cairo has been deprecated upstream, but it 0.8.0 still exists in the Karmic archive. That's the whole point of why it has a task here:
andrew@ andrew- laptop: ~$ apt-cache policy libclutter- cairo-0. 8-0 cairo-0. 8-0: us.archive. ubuntu. com karmic/universe Packages
libclutter-
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 0.8.2-1
Version table:
0.8.2-1 0
500 http://
The question is, should it be removed from the archive? Are we going to keep libclutter-0.8-0? It's co-installable. But we've successfully transitioned all its reverse dependencies?
andrew@ andrew- laptop: ~$ apt-cache policy libclutter-0.8-0 cairo-0. 8-0 0.8-dev 0.8-dbg
libclutter-0.8-0
Reverse Depends:
libclutter-
libclutter-
libclutter-
MOTU-Release, any opinion on whether we should leave libclutter- cairo-0. 8-0 and libclutter-0.8-0 around, or should I open removal requests on them?