On 16 April 2011 20:38, Clint Byrum <email address hidden> wrote:
> Oliver thats great!
>
> We usually try to get some third party who did not develop the fix to
> verify the proposed packages before marking it as "verification done".
>
> Anand, are you still affected by the original problem, and if so, would
> you be willing to try out the package from lucid-proposed?
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/700945
>
> Title:
> backport of patch for error message undefined method `closed?' for
> Nil:NilClass required.
>
> Status in puppet:
> Fix Released
> Status in “puppet” package in Ubuntu:
> Fix Released
> Status in “puppet” source package in Lucid:
> Fix Committed
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: puppet
>
>
> Hi,
>
> There are many versions of puppet, fortunately lucid (10.04) has a
> relatively new version (merely called legacy from puppetlabs).
>
> Unfortunately it has a number of bugs / issues, one of which I have
> recently encountered is an underlying bug in Ruby (and OpenSSL) on
> Lucid.
>
> However, the bug can be easily worked around, as noted two months
> after lucid's release.
>
> http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/html/puppet-
> <email address hidden>/2010-06/msg00206.html
>
> Basically, upgrading to the latest available version of puppet in the
> 'legacy' series will resolve the issue.
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/puppet/+bug/700945/+subscribe
>
>
Hi guys,
I am very happy to confirm that this worked great.
First it was gave me an indication that the remote server was not bitcube. co.uk/content/ puppet- errors- explained) and then it
responding (as per
http://
correclt diagnosed a mismatched server identity.
Thanks for getting this fix in.
Regards,
Anand
On 16 April 2011 20:38, Clint Byrum <email address hidden> wrote: /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 700945 www.mailinglist archive. com/html/ puppet- /2010-06/ msg00206. html /bugs.launchpad .net/puppet/ +bug/700945/ +subscribe
> Oliver thats great!
>
> We usually try to get some third party who did not develop the fix to
> verify the proposed packages before marking it as "verification done".
>
> Anand, are you still affected by the original problem, and if so, would
> you be willing to try out the package from lucid-proposed?
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> backport of patch for error message undefined method `closed?' for
> Nil:NilClass required.
>
> Status in puppet:
> Fix Released
> Status in “puppet” package in Ubuntu:
> Fix Released
> Status in “puppet” source package in Lucid:
> Fix Committed
>
> Bug description:
> Binary package hint: puppet
>
>
> Hi,
>
> There are many versions of puppet, fortunately lucid (10.04) has a
> relatively new version (merely called legacy from puppetlabs).
>
> Unfortunately it has a number of bugs / issues, one of which I have
> recently encountered is an underlying bug in Ruby (and OpenSSL) on
> Lucid.
>
> However, the bug can be easily worked around, as noted two months
> after lucid's release.
>
> http://
> <email address hidden>
>
> Basically, upgrading to the latest available version of puppet in the
> 'legacy' series will resolve the issue.
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https:/
>
>