Comment 10 for bug 688272

Revision history for this message
Martin-Éric Racine (q-funk) wrote :

Even though the original config fragment I proposed above should work, it seems that under specific circumstances, on some of my test hardware, loading the modules in that order fails. Additionally, unless I'm mistaken, it seems tat RAOP depends upon Zeroconf, so perhaps the following config segment would be safer:

.ifexists module-zeroconf-discover.so
.nofail
load-module module-zeroconf-discover
.fail
.endif
.ifexists module-raop-discover.so
.nofail
load-module module-raop-discover
.fail
.endif