Comment 276 for bug 192888

I'd like to test the new package also, but I only have a 64-bit install
so the i386 wouldn't work for me, I don't think.

cameo73 wrote:
> The combination libflashsupport + nswrapper-conn2 + flash 9 is indeed
> the most stable one (for me). I think the current (perceived)
> instability of Firefox/Flash (note that most people wouldn't know the
> difference) in Hardy is a real problem. I wouldn't be surprised that
> this has been a dealbreaker for people trying Ubuntu.
>
> Note to Robert Persson: nswrapper is originally meant to run x86 plugins
> in x64 environments. But it also has the benefit of 'sandboxing'
> plugins, so they don't crash the browser in case of a seg fault in the
> plugin. That's why the (I presume slightly modified) Conn version works:
> it doesn't fix the real issue, but it provides a nice workaround (i.e.
> limiting the crash effects -- and now negating them entirely).
>
> I personally hope this workaround will soon be released; especially
> since the currently available versions are (very) unstable.
>
>