Comment 2 for bug 1284415

Also the following, from time to time:
Feb 24 15:30:46 ubuntu-phablet pulseaudio[1903]: [alsa-sink-MultiMedia1 (*)] alsa-sink.c: Scheduling delay of 26.92ms > 14.11ms, you might want to investigate this to improve latency...
Feb 24 15:30:47 ubuntu-phablet pulseaudio[1903]: [alsa-sink-MultiMedia1 (*)] ratelimit.c: 203 events suppressed
Feb 24 15:30:47 ubuntu-phablet pulseaudio[1903]: [alsa-sink-MultiMedia1 (*)] alsa-sink.c: Wakeup from ALSA!
Feb 24 15:30:47 ubuntu-phablet pulseaudio[1903]: message repeated 10 times: [ [alsa-sink-MultiMedia1 (*)] alsa-sink.c: Wakeup from ALSA!]
Feb 24 15:30:48 ubuntu-phablet pulseaudio[1903]: [alsa-sink-MultiMedia1 (*)] alsa-sink.c: ALSA woke us up to write new data to the device, but there was actually nothing to write!
Feb 24 15:30:48 ubuntu-phablet pulseaudio[1903]: [alsa-sink-MultiMedia1 (*)] alsa-sink.c: Most likely this is a bug in the ALSA driver '(null)'. Please report this issue to the ALSA developers.
Feb 24 15:30:48 ubuntu-phablet pulseaudio[1903]: [alsa-sink-MultiMedia1 (*)] alsa-sink.c: We were woken up with POLLOUT set -- however a subsequent snd_pcm_avail() returned 0 or another value < min_avail.
Feb 24 15:30:52 ubuntu-phablet pulseaudio[1903]: [alsa-sink-MultiMedia1 (*)] alsa-sink.c: Scheduling delay of 32.41ms > 14.11ms, you might want to investigate this to improve latency...
Feb 24 15:30:52 ubuntu-phablet pulseaudio[1903]: [alsa-sink-MultiMedia1 (*)] ratelimit.c: 205 events suppressed
Feb 24 15:30:52 ubuntu-phablet pulseaudio[1903]: [alsa-sink-MultiMedia1 (*)] alsa-sink.c: Wakeup from ALSA!
Feb 24 15:30:54 ubuntu-phablet pulseaudio[1903]: [alsa-sink-MultiMedia1 (*)] alsa-sink.c: Scheduling delay of 21.88ms > 14.11ms, you might want to investigate this to improve latency...
Feb 24 15:30:54 ubuntu-phablet pulseaudio[1903]: [alsa-sink-MultiMedia1 (*)] alsa-sink.c: Scheduling delay of 22.75ms > 14.11ms, you might want to investigate this to improve latency...
Feb 24 15:30:55 ubuntu-phablet pulseaudio[1903]: [alsa-sink-MultiMedia1 (*)] alsa-sink.c: Scheduling delay of 16.65ms > 14.11ms, you might want to investigate this to improve latency...
....