Comment 2 for bug 1486192
Revision history for this message
| Ryan Chapman (rmc) wrote Re: [Bug 1486192] Re: libprotobuf9v5 : Conflicts: libprotobuf9 but 2.6.1-1 is installed. | #2 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
a60fb26
(Get the code!)
Thank you for the prompt response. Just to clarify, you're suggesting
pinning the Ubuntu 'mainstream' libprotobuf9 ahead of the libprotobuf9v5
coming from the PPA? Also, should I add/remove any of the other PPAs
managed under the "Ubuntu containers team". Obviously I've been using the
http://
add the related backports PPA,
http://
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:55 AM Stéphane Graber <email address hidden>
wrote:
> The issue was caused by our auto-backport of LXC and LXD dependencies so
> we can guarantee a consistent experience on all Ubuntu releases.
>
> This may indeed cause some occasional breakage when one of those
> packages revs their SOVER which is what happened there.
>
> We won't be rebuilding all the affected bits in our PPA. What I could
> recommend you do though is just pin the affected packages to the archive
> version. protobuf specifically is only needed for criu which is an
> optional dependency.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> libprotobuf9v5 : Conflicts: libprotobuf9 but 2.6.1-1 is installed.
>
> Status in protobuf package in Ubuntu:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> (1)
> # lsb_release -rd
> Description: Ubuntu 15.04
> Release: 15.04
>
> # uname -a
> Linux IPC1 3.19.0-25-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 24 21:17:31 UTC 2015
> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> (2)
> # apt-cache policy qtcreator libprotobuf9v5 libprotobuf9
> qtcreator:
> Installed: 3.1.1-0ubuntu9
> Candidate: 3.1.1-0ubuntu9
> Version table:
> *** 3.1.1-0ubuntu9 0
> 500 http://
> Packages
> 100 /var/lib/
> libprotobuf9v5:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 2.6.1-1.
> Version table:
> 2.6.1-1.
> 500 http://
> vivid/main amd64 Packages
> libprotobuf9:
> Installed: 2.6.1-1
> Candidate: 2.6.1-1
> Version table:
> *** 2.6.1-1 0
> 500 http://
> Packages
> 100 /var/lib/
>
> (3)
> I expected the the updated libprotobuf9, newly renamed upstream to
> libprotobuf9v5, to install and provide an alias/symlink/
> continue satisfying the dependencies of myriad other programs.
>
>
> (4)
> During regular system upgrade in the last two days or so, I get the
> following:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libprotobuf9v5 : Conflicts: libprotobuf9 but 2.6.1-1 is installed.
> The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
>
> Remove the following packages:
> 1) libegl1-mesa-dev
> 2) libgles2-mesa-dev
> 3) libmirclient-dev
> 4) libmircommon-dev
> 5) libprotobuf-dev
> 6) libqt5opengl5-dev
> 7) libqt5sensors5-dev
> 8) libqt5webkit5-dev
> 9) libqt5websocket
> 10) libqt5xmlpatter
> 11) python-protobuf
> 12) qt3d5-dev
> 13) qt5-default
> 14) qtbase5-dev
> 15) qtdeclarative5-dev
> 16) qtlocation5-dev
> 17) qtmultimedia5-dev
> 18) qtpositioning5-dev
> 19) qtscript5-dev
> 20) qttools5-dev
> 21) ubuntu-sdk
> 22) ubuntu-sdk-libs-dev
>
> Keep the following packages at their current version:
> 23) libprotobuf9v5 [Not Installed]
>
> Leave the following dependencies unresolved:
> 24) qtcreator recommends qt5-default
> 25) qtcreator recommends qtbase5-dev
> 26) qtcreator recommends qtdeclarative5-dev
> 27) qtcreator-
>
>
> Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?]
>
>
> I tried to let Ubuntu calculate multiple other solutions but all
> proposed look dubious to me and I've not tried any of them. I particularly
> interested in item 23 above but am not clear how to proceed. When I've
> explicitly tried to install libprotobuf9v5 directly, a much more terrible
> solution is proposed.
>
> From what I can tell with Google search,
> "
> https:/
> .",
> this appears to be caused by an upstream renaming of the package from
> libprotobuf9 --> libprotubuf9v5, as indicated in the various change
> logs.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https:/
>