Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:14:12 +0100
From: Matej Vela <email address hidden>
To: Eduard Bloch <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#346385: [NONFREE-DOC] man pppoeconf under the GFDL
Hello Eduard,
Filipus Klutiero <email address hidden> writes:
> Package: pppoeconf
> Version: 1.8
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.2.1
>
> The copyright file mentions only the GPL, but the manpage seems to
> contradict this.
> Since Eduard wrote this, relicensing shouldn't be too problematic
> :)
Would it be a problem to relicense pppoeconf.8 under the GPL or some
other uncontroversial license?
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:14:12 +0100
From: Matej Vela <email address hidden>
To: Eduard Bloch <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#346385: [NONFREE-DOC] man pppoeconf under the GFDL
Hello Eduard,
Filipus Klutiero <email address hidden> writes:
> Package: pppoeconf
> Version: 1.8
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.2.1
>
> The copyright file mentions only the GPL, but the manpage seems to
> contradict this.
> Since Eduard wrote this, relicensing shouldn't be too problematic
> :)
Would it be a problem to relicense pppoeconf.8 under the GPL or some
other uncontroversial license?
Thanks!
Matej