What do you propose instead? "smart" is not appropriate, since it needs an interminate waiting time. It uses "fast" by default to get a graceful shutdown. Only if that does not work, "immediate" is used as a fallback.
What do you propose instead? "smart" is not appropriate, since it needs an interminate waiting time. It uses "fast" by default to get a graceful shutdown. Only if that does not work, "immediate" is used as a fallback.