Which gave me an idea - it is locking related; adding -onolock makes the mount succeed in a few seconds.
I don't think I could argue for starting portmap by default - that would be insecure; but I think mount's behaviour without a local portmap should be more reasonable.
I can confirm it still occurs on feisty.
I've looked at what goes on with wireshark on 'lo'; something somewhere is doing a
portmap
[Program Version: 2]
[V2 Procedure: SET (1)]
Program: NLM (100021)
Version: 1
Proto: TCP (6)
Port: 38824
Which gave me an idea - it is locking related; adding -onolock makes the mount succeed in a few seconds.
I don't think I could argue for starting portmap by default - that would be insecure; but I think mount's behaviour without a local portmap should be more reasonable.
Dave