The change proposed in comment #4 seems to work fine for me. Why has there been no further activity for this bug? Surely every amd64 desktop user that uses at least one i386/i686 compatibility package must see this this problem?
The change proposed in comment #4 seems to work fine for me. Why has there been no further activity for this bug? Surely every amd64 desktop user that uses at least one i386/i686 compatibility package must see this this problem?