Comment 31 for bug 38674

Revision history for this message
In , Carlos Garcia Campos (carlosgc) wrote :

(In reply to comment #15)
> I'd say the change to Gfx.cc is ok, though i don't see the need for m1x and m1y
>

m1x and m1y are needed to restore m1[4] and m1[5] in case of falling back to Gfx code when out->tilingPatternFill() returns false.