On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 10:15 +0000, hyperair wrote:
> Ah yes, that's a good point. Then wouldn't it be a good idea to remove
> the block from /usr/lib/pm-utils/defaults? Having it in two places is
> redundant and can cause confusion.
Perhaps.
It does say at the top of the file "Do not edit this file, create a file
in /etc/pm/config.d/ instead".
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 10:15 +0000, hyperair wrote: pm-utils/ defaults? Having it in two places is
> Ah yes, that's a good point. Then wouldn't it be a good idea to remove
> the block from /usr/lib/
> redundant and can cause confusion.
Perhaps.
It does say at the top of the file "Do not edit this file, create a file
in /etc/pm/config.d/ instead".
Thanks,
James