>> Please note also https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/198808
>
>I saw the patch (88_change_pm_quirk_policy.patch) from the last comment
>already some days ago while check the ubuntu HAL package and was also
>wondering about. No idea why this change should make any sense, the current
>HAL code is IMO correct, no fix needed (except when you try to prevent
>suspend on nearly any machine).
>
>Danny
citing: http:// lists.freedeskt op.org/ archives/ hal/2008- March/011159. html
>> Please note also https:/ /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 198808 pm_quirk_ policy. patch) from the last comment
>
>I saw the patch (88_change_
>already some days ago while check the ubuntu HAL package and was also
>wondering about. No idea why this change should make any sense, the current
>HAL code is IMO correct, no fix needed (except when you try to prevent
>suspend on nearly any machine).
>
>Danny