On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 04:50 +0000, Steve Langasek wrote:
> That doesn't sound like this bug, and the behavior you describe is not
> reproducible here. It's possible that fsck is running longer than it
> should due to a backed-up queue of messages being sent to plymouth, but
> this would not be a hang, only a slow-down.
In my case, I think there may be something like you mention. I get the
same behaviour BUT fsck does complete, but takes over 20 mins and that
is with a tiny 8gig SSD
On Thu, 2010-04-29 at 04:50 +0000, Steve Langasek wrote:
> That doesn't sound like this bug, and the behavior you describe is not
> reproducible here. It's possible that fsck is running longer than it
> should due to a backed-up queue of messages being sent to plymouth, but
> this would not be a hang, only a slow-down.
In my case, I think there may be something like you mention. I get the
same behaviour BUT fsck does complete, but takes over 20 mins and that
is with a tiny 8gig SSD