Comment 19 for bug 1309617

> In the case when plymouthd has been started from
> the initramfs, we can be running the bridge straight
> away, otherwise it needs to wait for plymouthd to start.

I had assumed that the plymouth-upstart-bridge was designed to wait for plymouth to become available. Otherwise, it will lose events from anything that starts before plymouth does. Granted, that's very little, so *maybe* we don't care about this - in that case, the bridge should just be 'start on started plymouth'. However, otherwise the current start condition is correct and the daemon should simply be fixed to wait for plymouthd to start (probably using inotify).