On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 04:52:18PM -0000, Steve Langasek wrote:
> We actually did authorize such an SRU, because the bitcoin client was
> not just useless, it was actively harming the bitcoin network. I don't
> recall if this was actually done, but the precedent does exist.
On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 04:52:18PM -0000, Steve Langasek wrote:
> We actually did authorize such an SRU, because the bitcoin client was
> not just useless, it was actively harming the bitcoin network. I don't
> recall if this was actually done, but the precedent does exist.
Here's the diff I found last time I went looking for this precedent: launchpadlibrar ian.net/ 181578432/ bitcoin_ 0.3.24~ dfsg-1ubuntu0. 1_0.3.24~ dfsg-1ubuntu0. 2.diff. gz
http://
It was actually published to precise-updates: /launchpad. net/ubuntu/ +source/ bitcoin/ 0.3.24~ dfsg-1ubuntu0. 2
https:/
Thanks