There's a few small things that I'd like changed before we sponsor this:
- Since Ubuntu doesn't really have package 'maintainers', there's no need to point out it's a non-maintainer upload
- We like the security updates to all have consistent formatting as described on: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update_the_packaging
- We like the patches to have DEP-3 tags to indicate at least where the patch came from, so future readers can verify patches independently. (While DEP-3 is kind of complicated and involved, it's basically just adding Subject: with something short and descriptive and Origin: with a link to the patch.) The full DEP-3 guide is at http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/ but don't feel compelled to read it unless I did a poor job describing it here.
Could you submit a new patch with these items fixed up?
Hello Ismail, thanks for taking on this task.
There's a few small things that I'd like changed before we sponsor this:
- Since Ubuntu doesn't really have package 'maintainers', there's no need to point out it's a non-maintainer upload /wiki.ubuntu. com/SecurityTea m/UpdatePrepara tion#Update_ the_packaging dep.debian. net/deps/ dep3/ but don't feel compelled to read it unless I did a poor job describing it here.
- We like the security updates to all have consistent formatting as described on: https:/
- We like the patches to have DEP-3 tags to indicate at least where the patch came from, so future readers can verify patches independently. (While DEP-3 is kind of complicated and involved, it's basically just adding Subject: with something short and descriptive and Origin: with a link to the patch.) The full DEP-3 guide is at http://
Could you submit a new patch with these items fixed up?
Thanks