>> Huh? What about safe_mode? Does CVE officially declare safe_mode as
>> fundamentally insecure?
>
> Yes (except that it's not CVE who declared but vendor-sec).
Okay, this actually good news.
Shall I write a draft DSA and some documentation patches? Some of our
users rely on this feature and are not aware of its defects.
* Martin Schulze:
>> Huh? What about safe_mode? Does CVE officially declare safe_mode as
>> fundamentally insecure?
>
> Yes (except that it's not CVE who declared but vendor-sec).
Okay, this actually good news.
Shall I write a draft DSA and some documentation patches? Some of our
users rely on this feature and are not aware of its defects.