Comment 8 for bug 1887142

> Is it possible that any Ubuntu users consume libsejda-java directly, and thus would be regressed by bumping it to to the 1.1 spec?

Thanks for catching this. I updated the regression to include:
 Ubuntu users consuming libsejda-java directly can
 regress if something else in their dependency chain
 currently relies on spec 1.0 - they would need to
 update these dependencies to also use spec 1.1.

I don't know how I could/should evaluate how bad this is compared to having a non-working package such as pdfsam, so I would appreciate any feedback related to the SRU process on such decisions (maybe just having the regressions described is good enough?).