* Matthias Klose [Thu, 24 Nov 2005 22:29:15 +0100]:
> right, that approach looks better, although currently you have to
> rename both the package.
I discussed it with vorlon, and we were going with the "make libpcre3
conflict with everything that used libpcrecpp.so, which we expect will
be very little" option. Do you see some sort of problem with this
approach? (If I'm not mistaken, has been used for at least one package
in the previous ABI transition).
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Message-ID: <email address hidden> B?U2ltw7M= ?= <email address hidden>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 22:33:01 +0100
From: Adeodato =?utf-8?
To: Matthias Klose <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: libstdc++ allocator change
* Matthias Klose [Thu, 24 Nov 2005 22:29:15 +0100]:
> right, that approach looks better, although currently you have to
> rename both the package.
I discussed it with vorlon, and we were going with the "make libpcre3
conflict with everything that used libpcrecpp.so, which we expect will
be very little" option. Do you see some sort of problem with this
approach? (If I'm not mistaken, has been used for at least one package
in the previous ABI transition).
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org