Adrian Bunk wrote:
> It should be checked which of the versions in unstable/testing,
> stable and oldstable might be affected by CAN-2005-2491
> (PCRE Heap Overflow May Let Users Execute Arbitrary Code).
Which is unfortunatly still marked as "reserved" in the CVE db, so I
don't have any more info about it. URL?
--=20
see shy jo
--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:43:53 -0400
From: Joey Hess <email address hidden>
To: Adrian Bunk <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#324531: pcre3: CAN-2005-2491
--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l Disposition: inline Transfer- Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> It should be checked which of the versions in unstable/testing,
> stable and oldstable might be affected by CAN-2005-2491
> (PCRE Heap Overflow May Let Users Execute Arbitrary Code).
Which is unfortunatly still marked as "reserved" in the CVE db, so I
don't have any more info about it. URL?
--=20
see shy jo
--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l pgp-signature; name="signature .asc" Description: Digital signature Disposition: inline
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
HehbQuO8RAthzAJ 9aXMXQmWqRWYQMG 0zctWezqY/ HYQCg2c1e iTCJ1Tb8=
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDCmM5d8H
1LYr4MajKi7Osit
=HeaE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--XsQoSWH+ UP9D9v3l- -