Ubuntu
passivetex package

  1. Bug #25010
  2. Comment #26

Comment 26 for bug 25010

Revision history for this message
Debian Bug Importer (debzilla) wrote :

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:29:41 +0100
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, Norbert Preining <email address hidden>,
 Debian-teTeX-maint <email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: please remove passivetex from testing

severity 347884 serious
# passivetex will be removed from testing
thanks

Steve Langasek <email address hidden> wrote:

>> I could build the docs of gstreamer0.8 without having passivetex
>> installed. I could not test the full build as it gave an FTBFS at
>> another place, which was definitely not caused by missing passivetex.
>> As Frank stated passivetex is not functional the generated doccs
>> should not look different than without passivetex.
>
> Then if Norbert opts not to adopt passivetex, it sounds like an RC bug
> against gstreamer0.8 asking it not to depend on passivetex would be the
> answer?

Adjusted severity.

Regards, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer