Log in / Register
Ubuntu
partman-basicfilesystems package
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #1065281
Comment #115
Comment 115 for bug 1065281
Revision history for this message
Phillip Susi (psusi)
wrote
on 2013-11-05
:
#115
Wait, what? Why does it need to be 512 MB now? I already thought that 100 MB was absurdly large.
Wait, what? Why does it need to be 512 MB now? I already thought that 100 MB was absurdly large.
Wait, what? Why does it need to be 512 MB now? I already thought that 100 MB was absurdly large.