Here's parted "list" command, using stock versions (so 1.7.1 for 8.04 and 2.2 for 10.04):
8.04:
(parted) print
Disk /dev/sda: 160GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 32.3kB 197MB 197MB primary ext3 boot
2 197MB 160GB 160GB extended
5 197MB 2246MB 2048MB logical linux-swap
6 2246MB 4294MB 2048MB logical ext3
7 4294MB 160GB 156GB logical ext3
10.04:
(parted) print
Model: ATA WDC WD1600AAJS-0 (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 160GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 1049kB 200MB 199MB primary ext4 boot
2 201MB 160GB 160GB extended
5 201MB 2248MB 2047MB logical linux-swap(v1)
6 2249MB 4296MB 2047MB logical ext4
7 4297MB 160GB 156GB logical ext4
I am under the impression that the previous way of handling the partition recipe was to align everything to cylinders, thus making my boot partition 197mb instead of 200mb.
Here's parted "list" command, using stock versions (so 1.7.1 for 8.04 and 2.2 for 10.04):
8.04:
(parted) print
Disk /dev/sda: 160GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 32.3kB 197MB 197MB primary ext3 boot
2 197MB 160GB 160GB extended
5 197MB 2246MB 2048MB logical linux-swap
6 2246MB 4294MB 2048MB logical ext3
7 4294MB 160GB 156GB logical ext3
10.04:
(parted) print
Model: ATA WDC WD1600AAJS-0 (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 160GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: msdos
Number Start End Size Type File system Flags
1 1049kB 200MB 199MB primary ext4 boot
2 201MB 160GB 160GB extended
5 201MB 2248MB 2047MB logical linux-swap(v1)
6 2249MB 4296MB 2047MB logical ext4
7 4297MB 160GB 156GB logical ext4
I am under the impression that the previous way of handling the partition recipe was to align everything to cylinders, thus making my boot partition 197mb instead of 200mb.