Comment 3 for bug 1704130

- papi-examples Depends on mpi-defaults-dev, you most likely want to avoid further complicating the MIR with an additional MIR for mpi-defaults.

- there is no subscribing team.

Now, because this is a very complex package that proposes to be a performance API for software and could thus introduce an attack surface to the software it is applied to, I'd rather if there was a security review for it like there was for pcp.

I see no other issues with the package, the packaging looks to be high-quality and appropriately maintained in Debian, upstream looks responsive, etc.