Ubuntu
oxine package

  1. Bug #159338
  2. Comment #10

Comment 10 for bug 159338

Revision history for this message
Jaldhar (jaldhar) wrote : Re: [Bug 159338] Re: Re: Heads-up: small xine-lib transition in hardy

On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Reinhard Tartler wrote:

> Emmet Hikory <email address hidden> writes:
>
>>> From a quick look at pyxine, the correct dependencies of python-pyxine
>> are not clear, given that one could write either an X or console
>> binding. The only reverse dependency of python-pyxine is lsongs. I see
>> two options, and encourage someone more familar with python or xine to
>> select one (or suggest something preferable)
>>
>> A) Add libxine1-x | libxine1-console | libxine1 (<< 1.1.8-2) to pyxine-xine dependencies
>> B) Add libxine1-x to lsongs dependencies & nothing to pyxine-xine
>
> My current guess is that we should go with option B. I've CC'ed the
> debian pyxine maintainer in this email.
>
> Jaldhar, what are your plans regarding the pyxine package in Debian?
>

Actually, I am slowly in the process of orphaning lsongs and all its
dependencies. I am willing to fix all outstanding bugs first though.

--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <email address hidden>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/