Comment 8 for bug 6761

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:59:04 +0100
From: Christoph Martin <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
CC: <email address hidden>
Subject: [Fwd: [openssl.org #448] [Fwd: Bug#176062: openssl: Expired
 certificates and recertification]]

--------------enig0F18902F42B1F21D62F2122A
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050608020606010300060204"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050608020606010300060204
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

FYI

--------------050608020606010300060204
Content-Type: message/rfc822;
 name="[openssl.org #448] [Fwd: Bug#176062: openssl: Expired
 certificates and recertification]"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename="[openssl.org #448] [Fwd: Bug#176062: openssl: Expired
 certificates and recertification]"

Received: via dmail-2000(11) for martin; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:26:31 +0100 (CET)
Return-Path: <email address hidden>
Received: from lucy.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (lucy.Verwaltung.Uni-Mainz.DE
 [134.93.144.162])
 by wintermute.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with
 ESMTP id h0DFQO0C016547
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL)
 for <email address hidden>;
 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:26:25 +0100
Received: from mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE
 [134.93.8.56])
 by lucy.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id
 h0DFQLjb003183
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
 for <email address hidden>;
 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:26:21 +0100
Received: from exfront2.zdv.uni-mainz.de (exfront2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE
 [134.93.8.76])
 by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id
 h0DFQKe6017324 for <email address hidden>;
 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:26:20 +0100 (MET)
Received: from spamgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE ([134.93.8.232]) by
 exfront2.zdv.uni-mainz.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);
 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:26:19 +0100
Received: from mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE
 [134.93.8.56])
 by spamgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.12.6/8.12.2) with ESMTP id
 h0DFQEIs004085
 for <email address hidden>; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:26:14 +0100 (MET)
Received: from serv01.aet.tu-cottbus.de (serv01.aet.TU-Cottbus.De
 [141.43.132.161])
 by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id
 h0DFQDe7017297
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT)
 for <email address hidden>; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:26:13 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by serv01.aet.tu-cottbus.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
 id 14D533256; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:24:12 +0100 (MET)
Received: by serv01.aet.tu-cottbus.de (Postfix, from userid 29999)
 id BA0FE3254; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:24:07 +0100 (MET)
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: openssl.org
Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Subject: [openssl.org #448] [Fwd: Bug#176062: openssl: Expired certificates
 and recertification]
In-Reply-To: <email address hidden>
Managed-BY: RT 2.0.15 (http://bestpractical.com/rt/)
From: "Richard Levitte via RT" <email address hidden>
RT-Ticket: openssl.org #448
X-Mailer: Perl5 Mail::Internet v1.33
Reply-To: <email address hidden>
Precedence: bulk
RT-Originator: <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Sender: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:24:07 +0100 (MET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20011031
X-Spam-Report: CARRIAGE_RETURNS, FWD_MSG, IN_REP_TO, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
 SUPERLONG_LINE
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2003 15:26:19.0725 (UTC)
 FILETIME=[1F393FD0:01C2BB18]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5 tests=FWD_MSG, IN_REP_TO,
 SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
 SUPERLONG_LINE version=2.43
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.21 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)

[<email address hidden> - Fri Jan 10 15:09:40 2003]:

It's correct, recertification doesn't work very well. A change would however mean making a substantial change to the database (index.txt), which makes it too complicated to get into the 0.9.7 branch.

I'm planning to work on changing this behavior for 0.9.8. Therefore, I'll make sure this ticket has 0.9.8 as milestone.

--
Richard Levitte

--------------050608020606010300060204--

--------------enig0F18902F42B1F21D62F2122A
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE+IvBYgeVih7XOVJcRAnNKAJ0TeHo8WNkHiu6LFLMa53QLLSeNpwCffCRz
Ya7gCekfJsL11/ZT1GMJQWc=
=M42Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig0F18902F42B1F21D62F2122A--