Comment 12 for bug 6761

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 12:03:56 +0200
From: Christoph Martin <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
CC: <email address hidden>
Subject: [Fwd: [openssl.org #448] [Fwd: Bug#176062: openssl: Expired
 certificates and recertification]]

--------------enig025C4356ECEEE13F1D4E330E
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------070106000203030505010508"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------070106000203030505010508
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Wichert,

upstream wants to fix the problem in version 0.9.8. But I don't know
when this will come. I try to find out, if there is a workaround.

Christoph

PS: Why do you think, this is a serious policy violation?

--
============================================================================
Christoph Martin, EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany
 Internet-Mail: <email address hidden>
  Telefon: +49-6131-3926337
      Fax: +49-6131-3922856

--------------070106000203030505010508
Content-Type: message/rfc822;
 name="[openssl.org #448] [Fwd: Bug#176062: openssl: Expired
 certificates and recertification]"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename="[openssl.org #448] [Fwd: Bug#176062: openssl: Expired
 certificates and recertification]"

Received: via dmail-2000(11) for martin; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:26:31 +0100 (CET)
Return-Path: <email address hidden>
Received: from lucy.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (lucy.Verwaltung.Uni-Mainz.DE
 [134.93.144.162])
 by wintermute.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with
 ESMTP id h0DFQO0C016547
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL)
 for <email address hidden>;
 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:26:25 +0100
Received: from mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE
 [134.93.8.56])
 by lucy.verwaltung.uni-mainz.de (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id
 h0DFQLjb003183
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
 for <email address hidden>;
 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:26:21 +0100
Received: from exfront2.zdv.uni-mainz.de (exfront2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE
 [134.93.8.76])
 by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id
 h0DFQKe6017324 for <email address hidden>;
 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:26:20 +0100 (MET)
Received: from spamgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE ([134.93.8.232]) by
 exfront2.zdv.uni-mainz.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);
 Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:26:19 +0100
Received: from mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE
 [134.93.8.56])
 by spamgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.12.6/8.12.2) with ESMTP id
 h0DFQEIs004085
 for <email address hidden>; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:26:14 +0100 (MET)
Received: from serv01.aet.tu-cottbus.de (serv01.aet.TU-Cottbus.De
 [141.43.132.161])
 by mailgate1.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id
 h0DFQDe7017297
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT)
 for <email address hidden>; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:26:13 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by serv01.aet.tu-cottbus.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
 id 14D533256; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:24:12 +0100 (MET)
Received: by serv01.aet.tu-cottbus.de (Postfix, from userid 29999)
 id BA0FE3254; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:24:07 +0100 (MET)
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: openssl.org
Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Subject: [openssl.org #448] [Fwd: Bug#176062: openssl: Expired certificates
 and recertification]
In-Reply-To: <email address hidden>
Managed-BY: RT 2.0.15 (http://bestpractical.com/rt/)
From: "Richard Levitte via RT" <email address hidden>
RT-Ticket: openssl.org #448
X-Mailer: Perl5 Mail::Internet v1.33
Reply-To: <email address hidden>
Precedence: bulk
RT-Originator: <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Sender: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 16:24:07 +0100 (MET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20011031
X-Spam-Report: CARRIAGE_RETURNS, FWD_MSG, IN_REP_TO, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
 SUPERLONG_LINE
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2003 15:26:19.0725 (UTC)
 FILETIME=[1F393FD0:01C2BB18]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5 tests=FWD_MSG, IN_REP_TO,
 SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE, SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
 SUPERLONG_LINE version=2.43
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.21 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)

[<email address hidden> - Fri Jan 10 15:09:40 2003]:

It's correct, recertification doesn't work very well. A change would however mean making a substantial change to the database (index.txt), which makes it too complicated to get into the 0.9.7 branch.

I'm planning to work on changing this behavior for 0.9.8. Therefore, I'll make sure this ticket has 0.9.8 as milestone.

--
Richard Levitte

--------------070106000203030505010508--

--------------enig025C4356ECEEE13F1D4E330E
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAhPWNgeVih7XOVJcRArMaAJ9dohZSveCtHSz1t1HjltBCo0hRVACeN16J
fEraQemyfblQq16dq14poQA=
=pBhy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig025C4356ECEEE13F1D4E330E--