Comment 20 for bug 483928

(In reply to comment #17)
>
> Oh boy, I missed something. Is this repeatable? I think I saw this
> myself somewhere along the line but I thought I had fixed the problem.
> Since my time is pretty much taken up for the next week or so, I don't
> know when I'll be able to check.

Well, I tried it again, and it ran to completion. Must be a rare failure mode.

> I just looked at the attachment. There are two ".orig"s per file. One
> is on the `diff' statement and is ignored (I hope) by `patch'. The
> second is one line down on the "old" file identifier (---) and `patch'
> does use that. Which one was your `patch' making complaints about?

Presumably the second one. It was looking for e.g. kex.c.orig rather than kex.c.

> STDERR is extremely noisy as it is. In my case, at this time, I think
> I'd add on the order of 7000+ extra lines when I use '-L' that I'd need
> to winnow to find any important data. Besides, you can't forget that
> god called "upward compatibility" you know (;-}).
>
> And yes, if you meant "Connection timed out", I think that they are
> distinct at least from a Systems Administrator (me) point of view.

*shrugs* I'd pretty much expect a flood of information anyway. Given a large network, you have to use grep(1) or the like to make any sense of it.