First tests look promising. I've informed my co-workers of this fix. I'll keep you updated on issues found.
BTW: The man-page of mount.cifs says:
Do not send byte range lock requests to the server. This is
necessary for certain applications that break with cifs style
mandatory byte range locks (and most cifs servers do not yet
support requesting advisory byte range locks).
It seems that this BRL-function is rather experimental? Maybe it should be a default option than?
First tests look promising. I've informed my co-workers of this fix. I'll keep you updated on issues found.
BTW: The man-page of mount.cifs says:
Do not send byte range lock requests to the server. This is
necessary for certain applications that break with cifs style
mandatory byte range locks (and most cifs servers do not yet
support requesting advisory byte range locks).
It seems that this BRL-function is rather experimental? Maybe it should be a default option than?