(In reply to dante19031999 from comment #19)
> Your starmath syntax is just wrong. The command = needs valid expressions at
> both sides, newline indicates end of expression, it is not an expression on
> itself.
> a+b_ij = {} newline {} = c+d
Agree. That is how we handle the NEWLINE command. As pointed out in comment 4 and comment 5 above. And, attempt to modify parser behavior were not viable.
And this becomes a documentation issue against describing behavior of NEWLINE on formula layout [1][2]. What should be said about SM use of NEWLINE command and its effect on parsing starmath/mathml syntax for rendering of formula(s) to canvas?
(In reply to dante19031999 from comment #19)
> Your starmath syntax is just wrong. The command = needs valid expressions at
> both sides, newline indicates end of expression, it is not an expression on
> itself.
> a+b_ij = {} newline {} = c+d
Agree. That is how we handle the NEWLINE command. As pointed out in comment 4 and comment 5 above. And, attempt to modify parser behavior were not viable.
And this becomes a documentation issue against describing behavior of NEWLINE on formula layout [1][2]. What should be said about SM use of NEWLINE command and its effect on parsing starmath/mathml syntax for rendering of formula(s) to canvas?
=-ref-= /help.libreoffi ce.org/ latest/ en-US/text/ smath/guide/ newline. html?DbPAR= MATH#bm_ id1295205 /help.libreoffi ce.org/ latest/ en-US/text/ smath/01/ 05040000. html?DbPAR= MATH#bm_ id3148730
[1] https:/
[2] https:/