Comment 43 for bug 281053

Revision history for this message
In , Vstuart-foote (vstuart-foote) wrote :

(In reply to dante19031999 from comment #19)
> Your starmath syntax is just wrong. The command = needs valid expressions at
> both sides, newline indicates end of expression, it is not an expression on
> itself.
> a+b_ij = {} newline {} = c+d

Agree. That is how we handle the NEWLINE command. As pointed out in comment 4 and comment 5 above. And, attempt to modify parser behavior were not viable.

And this becomes a documentation issue against describing behavior of NEWLINE on formula layout [1][2]. What should be said about SM use of NEWLINE command and its effect on parsing starmath/mathml syntax for rendering of formula(s) to canvas?

=-ref-=
[1] https://help.libreoffice.org/latest/en-US/text/smath/guide/newline.html?DbPAR=MATH#bm_id1295205
[2] https://help.libreoffice.org/latest/en-US/text/smath/01/05040000.html?DbPAR=MATH#bm_id3148730