How can this possibly be a duplicate of 311251???
311251 explicitly is talking about klipper. We have known for nearly a year that this bug is present regardless of klipper's presence.
I'm sorry, but I don't understand how, if klipper isn't running, this bug can be related to klipper. Please explain.
How can this possibly be a duplicate of 311251???
311251 explicitly is talking about klipper. We have known for nearly a year that this bug is present regardless of klipper's presence.
I'm sorry, but I don't understand how, if klipper isn't running, this bug can be related to klipper. Please explain.