> Hmm, now that we're build-depending on UnixODBC instead of iODBC, it
> might also cause problems for back_sql. If you think this is the right
> solution otherwise, we could revert back to iodbc for the time being.
> (I seem to have a bug to shake out there anyway, openldap2.3 as it
> stands seems to be missing a build-conflicts with libiodbc2...)
I think the right solution is to change Perl, honestly. I just don't have
any time to pursue that with Brendan.
Steve Langasek <email address hidden> writes:
> Hmm, now that we're build-depending on UnixODBC instead of iODBC, it
> might also cause problems for back_sql. If you think this is the right
> solution otherwise, we could revert back to iodbc for the time being.
> (I seem to have a bug to shake out there anyway, openldap2.3 as it
> stands seems to be missing a build-conflicts with libiodbc2...)
I think the right solution is to change Perl, honestly. I just don't have
any time to pursue that with Brendan.
-- www.eyrie. org/~eagle/>
Russ Allbery (<email address hidden>) <http://