A Debian user reported about a missing checkpoint directive in
slapd.conf leading to data loss (see http://bugs.debian.org/272984). I
can't imagine how that would happen but I wonder why checkpointing is
only done during shutdown of slapd by default (I'd expect that to happen
really seldom).
I'd rather have the default changed if it increases data security=20
or slapd behaviour in case of a system crash. But I guess that's=20
upstreams call.=20
Comments?
Greetings
Torsten
--EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 01:49:47 +0100
From: Torsten Landschoff <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Checkpointing in slapd bdb backend?
--EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD Disposition: inline Transfer- Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
Hi all,=20
A Debian user reported about a missing checkpoint directive in bugs.debian. org/272984). I
slapd.conf leading to data loss (see http://
can't imagine how that would happen but I wonder why checkpointing is
only done during shutdown of slapd by default (I'd expect that to happen
really seldom).
I'd rather have the default changed if it increases data security=20
or slapd behaviour in case of a system crash. But I guess that's=20
upstreams call.=20
Comments?
Greetings
Torsten
--EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD pgp-signature; name="signature .asc" Description: Digital signature Disposition: inline
Content-Type: application/
Content-
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
HtVUb5EcRAhCfAJ 9hEs4pvowCQs3EM BGnXt12+ /hYOwCfc9An xKtN6eMg=
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBkBQrdQg
HUBjmCxZDlP0VHP
=oKAy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--EuxKj2iCbKjpU GkD--