Publishing documents on a wiki isn't always appropriate. While it may be easier for people to make corrections, there can also be a negative impact on quality control. As I am sure you will agree, quality control is particularly important for server documentation. The documentation team lacks the resources to maintain an editorial team for the wiki on the scale that would be required and so we keep the server guide as an "official" document.
We are always happy to review and accept patches, although we are limited by the need to go through the SRU process when we change documentation for stable releases (we can't just push changes immediately). If you are interested in contributing, please get in touch with us; details at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DocumentationTeam and we'll be happy to help you get started.
Hi atom88,
Publishing documents on a wiki isn't always appropriate. While it may be easier for people to make corrections, there can also be a negative impact on quality control. As I am sure you will agree, quality control is particularly important for server documentation. The documentation team lacks the resources to maintain an editorial team for the wiki on the scale that would be required and so we keep the server guide as an "official" document.
We are always happy to review and accept patches, although we are limited by the need to go through the SRU process when we change documentation for stable releases (we can't just push changes immediately). If you are interested in contributing, please get in touch with us; details at https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/Documentati onTeam and we'll be happy to help you get started.