Ubuntu
openjpeg2 package

  1. Bug #711061
  2. Comment #59

Comment 59 for bug 711061

Revision history for this message
Seth Arnold (seth-arnold) wrote :

I've started in on a new review of openjpeg2. The code is vastly improved since the last time I read it but it still has rough edges. So far I've filed:

https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/1065
https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/1066
https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/1067
https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/1068
https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/1069
https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/1070
https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/1071
https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/1072
https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/1073
https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/1074
https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/1075
https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/1076
https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/1077
https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/1078
https://github.com/uclouvain/openjpeg/issues/1079

cppcheck still returns a lot of results, it'd be nice to bring that to zero.

Thanks