Comment 22 for bug 1799946

> Although that works, its quite an hack. Can't we have something like openjdk-8-jfx,
> openjdk-8-jfx-source, openjdk-11-jfx, ...

It should possibly "just" be consistent. JavaFX *always* depends upon a particular JDK. Either make different versions of openjfx available for different openjdks (if there are different openjdk packages), or add *just* one openjdk and one openjfx package where it's easy to, say, downgrade openjd from 11 to 8 and be sure the installed openjfx package will either have a broken dependency or be downgraded as well. Current approach to handle this seems pretty much worst of both worlds. :|