Comment 5 for bug 1956004

Revision history for this message
Alec Leamas (leamas-alec) wrote :

@Dan: Thanks for review!

> While Debian uses 'Closes:', Ubuntu uses 'LP:', so this should be

Done

> technically, debhelper 13 is in focal-backports (and even bionic-backports), but if you don't actually need level 13 it's fine to reduce it in the backport.

Actually, it turns out the I did need it in a way. I had dropped override_dh_missing which is
default in 13 but not in 12. It's now back in place, and the compat-level == 12 is OK as far as I can see.

> I see focal has opencpn-plugins_5.0.0+dfsg-1_all.deb, which is a dummy transitional package, but there's no corresponding opencpn-plugins package in later releases.

Good catch, which my Debian reviews missed... Anyway, I followed your advice and made the Breaks: and Replaces: unconditional. Update smoke test seems OK.

> If not you may need to find a sponsor

Yes, I need a sponsor; assuming this is the hard part. Had one contact (Gianfranco) but he seems unavailable.

Is there a formal process for getting in touch with a sponsor, like the mentors site and RFS bugs in Debian? Or should I drop a mail in the ubuntu-backports mailnig list? Or?