On 06/08/2010 01:08 PM, NoOp wrote: > Thanks very much for the confirmation PatG. So we can possibly rule out > GDM being the cause & 96 as the issue. Sorry should be '& confirm 96 as the issue.'
On 06/08/2010 01:08 PM, NoOp wrote:
> Thanks very much for the confirmation PatG. So we can possibly rule out
> GDM being the cause & 96 as the issue.
Sorry should be '& confirm 96 as the issue.'