I've never used this -proposed repo and had a coupla questions..(my son son
Sean Feole works for Canonical as well)
I've been using Ubuntu for work/home use since 2006 or so when i was at Sun
and heard about it via Solaris Engineering...
Anyway, I enabled the -proposed repo, and I see a lot of stuff. My
question is, can I deselect all the other stuff and only load the NVIDIA
346 stuff? Guess my real question is, what stuff do I need to install to
rectify this NVIDIA bug..?
Thank You,
John Feole
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Adam Conrad <adconrad@0c3.net> wrote:
> Hello Stefan, or anyone else affected,
>
> Accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 into trusty-proposed. The package
> will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
> /nvidia-graphics-drivers-340/340.76-0ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then
> in the -proposed repository.
>
> Please help us by testing this new package. See
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
> enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update
> out to other Ubuntu users.
>
> If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
> mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
> from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the
> bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to
> verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help
> us make a better decision.
>
> Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
> advance!
>
> ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-340-updates (Ubuntu Trusty)
> Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431753
>
> Title:
> Nvidia binary driver FTBS due to DKMS layer violation
>
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-331 package in Ubuntu:
> Confirmed
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-331-updates package in Ubuntu:
> Confirmed
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 package in Ubuntu:
> Fix Released
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340-updates package in Ubuntu:
> Fix Released
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-346 package in Ubuntu:
> Fix Released
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-346-updates package in Ubuntu:
> Fix Released
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-331 source package in Trusty:
> Triaged
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-331-updates source package in Trusty:
> Triaged
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 source package in Trusty:
> Fix Committed
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340-updates source package in Trusty:
> Fix Committed
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-346 source package in Trusty:
> Fix Committed
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-346-updates source package in Trusty:
> Fix Committed
>
> Bug description:
> Filing this against the 340-updates version but possibly the same
> applies to older versions, too. The nvidia source package produces two
> individual dkms packages: nvidia-340-updates, nvidia-340-updates-uvm.
> The problem is that the DKMS build of the nvidia-uvm module runs
> compile steps inside the nvidia modules build directory. This is
> violating the DKMS assumption that each module can be build
> independently (there is no way of describing cross-modules
> dependencies and even more important, the autoinstall step after a new
> kernel is installed will run the modules build in parallel).
>
> Since nvidia and nvidia-uvm are very dependent on each other the right
> course of action seems to be to combine both sources in one DKMS
> module that produces two kernel modules (this is supported by DKMS).
> For the transition this resulting dkms package needs to have a
> breaks/replaces for the nvidia-uvm package.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331/+bug/1431753/+subscriptions
>
Hi Adam,
I've never used this -proposed repo and had a coupla questions..(my son son
Sean Feole works for Canonical as well)
I've been using Ubuntu for work/home use since 2006 or so when i was at Sun
and heard about it via Solaris Engineering...
Anyway, I enabled the -proposed repo, and I see a lot of stuff. My
question is, can I deselect all the other stuff and only load the NVIDIA
346 stuff? Guess my real question is, what stuff do I need to install to
rectify this NVIDIA bug..?
Thank You,
John Feole
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Adam Conrad <adconrad@0c3.net> wrote:
> Hello Stefan, or anyone else affected, graphics- drivers- 340 into trusty-proposed. The package /launchpad. net/ubuntu/ +source graphics- drivers- 340/340. 76-0ubuntu0. 1 in a few hours, and then /wiki.ubuntu. com/Testing/ EnableProposed for documentation how to failed. In either case, details of your testing will help /wiki.ubuntu. com/QATeam/ PerformingSRUVe rification . Thank you in graphics- drivers- 340-updates (Ubuntu Trusty) /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1431753 graphics- drivers- 331 package in Ubuntu: graphics- drivers- 331-updates package in Ubuntu: graphics- drivers- 340 package in Ubuntu: graphics- drivers- 340-updates package in Ubuntu: graphics- drivers- 346 package in Ubuntu: graphics- drivers- 346-updates package in Ubuntu: graphics- drivers- 331 source package in Trusty: graphics- drivers- 331-updates source package in Trusty: graphics- drivers- 340 source package in Trusty: graphics- drivers- 340-updates source package in Trusty: graphics- drivers- 346 source package in Trusty: graphics- drivers- 346-updates source package in Trusty: 340-updates- uvm. /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ nvidia- graphics- drivers- 331/+bug/ 1431753/ +subscriptions
>
> Accepted nvidia-
> will build now and be available at https:/
> /nvidia-
> in the -proposed repository.
>
> Please help us by testing this new package. See
> https:/
> enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update
> out to other Ubuntu users.
>
> If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
> mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
> from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the
> bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to
> verification-
> us make a better decision.
>
> Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
> https:/
> advance!
>
> ** Changed in: nvidia-
> Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> Nvidia binary driver FTBS due to DKMS layer violation
>
> Status in nvidia-
> Confirmed
> Status in nvidia-
> Confirmed
> Status in nvidia-
> Fix Released
> Status in nvidia-
> Fix Released
> Status in nvidia-
> Fix Released
> Status in nvidia-
> Fix Released
> Status in nvidia-
> Triaged
> Status in nvidia-
> Triaged
> Status in nvidia-
> Fix Committed
> Status in nvidia-
> Fix Committed
> Status in nvidia-
> Fix Committed
> Status in nvidia-
> Fix Committed
>
> Bug description:
> Filing this against the 340-updates version but possibly the same
> applies to older versions, too. The nvidia source package produces two
> individual dkms packages: nvidia-340-updates, nvidia-
> The problem is that the DKMS build of the nvidia-uvm module runs
> compile steps inside the nvidia modules build directory. This is
> violating the DKMS assumption that each module can be build
> independently (there is no way of describing cross-modules
> dependencies and even more important, the autoinstall step after a new
> kernel is installed will run the modules build in parallel).
>
> Since nvidia and nvidia-uvm are very dependent on each other the right
> course of action seems to be to combine both sources in one DKMS
> module that produces two kernel modules (this is supported by DKMS).
> For the transition this resulting dkms package needs to have a
> breaks/replaces for the nvidia-uvm package.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https:/
>