Nima this really isn't the place for that talk. Will EVERYONE please keep
this thread on topic about this bug and only this bug please
On 19 Jun 2015 21:51, "Nima" <email address hidden> wrote:
> I want to go to another linux distribution ,
> Can any body give me a hint about it?
> CentOS or Opensuse? Which one is better?
> which one has a full resource of software like ,for example "ubuntu
> software center"?
> Thanks for any help in advance
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (1412043).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1431753
>
> Title:
> Nvidia binary driver FTBS due to DKMS layer violation
>
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-331 package in Ubuntu:
> Confirmed
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-331-updates package in Ubuntu:
> Confirmed
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 package in Ubuntu:
> Fix Released
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340-updates package in Ubuntu:
> Fix Released
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-346 package in Ubuntu:
> Fix Released
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-346-updates package in Ubuntu:
> Fix Released
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-331 source package in Trusty:
> Triaged
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-331-updates source package in Trusty:
> Triaged
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 source package in Trusty:
> Confirmed
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340-updates source package in Trusty:
> Confirmed
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-346 source package in Trusty:
> Confirmed
> Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-346-updates source package in Trusty:
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> Filing this against the 340-updates version but possibly the same
> applies to older versions, too. The nvidia source package produces two
> individual dkms packages: nvidia-340-updates, nvidia-340-updates-uvm.
> The problem is that the DKMS build of the nvidia-uvm module runs
> compile steps inside the nvidia modules build directory. This is
> violating the DKMS assumption that each module can be build
> independently (there is no way of describing cross-modules
> dependencies and even more important, the autoinstall step after a new
> kernel is installed will run the modules build in parallel).
>
> Since nvidia and nvidia-uvm are very dependent on each other the right
> course of action seems to be to combine both sources in one DKMS
> module that produces two kernel modules (this is supported by DKMS).
> For the transition this resulting dkms package needs to have a
> breaks/replaces for the nvidia-uvm package.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331/+bug/1431753/+subscriptions
>
Nima this really isn't the place for that talk. Will EVERYONE please keep
this thread on topic about this bug and only this bug please
On 19 Jun 2015 21:51, "Nima" <email address hidden> wrote:
> I want to go to another linux distribution , /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1431753 graphics- drivers- 331 package in Ubuntu: graphics- drivers- 331-updates package in Ubuntu: graphics- drivers- 340 package in Ubuntu: graphics- drivers- 340-updates package in Ubuntu: graphics- drivers- 346 package in Ubuntu: graphics- drivers- 346-updates package in Ubuntu: graphics- drivers- 331 source package in Trusty: graphics- drivers- 331-updates source package in Trusty: graphics- drivers- 340 source package in Trusty: graphics- drivers- 340-updates source package in Trusty: graphics- drivers- 346 source package in Trusty: graphics- drivers- 346-updates source package in Trusty: 340-updates- uvm. /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ nvidia- graphics- drivers- 331/+bug/ 1431753/ +subscriptions
> Can any body give me a hint about it?
> CentOS or Opensuse? Which one is better?
> which one has a full resource of software like ,for example "ubuntu
> software center"?
> Thanks for any help in advance
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (1412043).
> https:/
>
> Title:
> Nvidia binary driver FTBS due to DKMS layer violation
>
> Status in nvidia-
> Confirmed
> Status in nvidia-
> Confirmed
> Status in nvidia-
> Fix Released
> Status in nvidia-
> Fix Released
> Status in nvidia-
> Fix Released
> Status in nvidia-
> Fix Released
> Status in nvidia-
> Triaged
> Status in nvidia-
> Triaged
> Status in nvidia-
> Confirmed
> Status in nvidia-
> Confirmed
> Status in nvidia-
> Confirmed
> Status in nvidia-
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> Filing this against the 340-updates version but possibly the same
> applies to older versions, too. The nvidia source package produces two
> individual dkms packages: nvidia-340-updates, nvidia-
> The problem is that the DKMS build of the nvidia-uvm module runs
> compile steps inside the nvidia modules build directory. This is
> violating the DKMS assumption that each module can be build
> independently (there is no way of describing cross-modules
> dependencies and even more important, the autoinstall step after a new
> kernel is installed will run the modules build in parallel).
>
> Since nvidia and nvidia-uvm are very dependent on each other the right
> course of action seems to be to combine both sources in one DKMS
> module that produces two kernel modules (this is supported by DKMS).
> For the transition this resulting dkms package needs to have a
> breaks/replaces for the nvidia-uvm package.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https:/
>