Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy S® 6.-------- Original message --------
From: Nima <email address hidden>
Date: 06/19/2015 3:43 AM (GMT-07:00)
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: [Bug 1431753] Re: Nvidia binary driver FTBS due to DKMS layer
violation
I want to go to another linux distribution ,
Can any body give me a hint about it?
CentOS or Opensuse? Which one is better?
which one has a full resource of software like ,for example "ubuntu software center"?
Thanks for any help in advance
Title:
Nvidia binary driver FTBS due to DKMS layer violation
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-331 package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-331-updates package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340-updates package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-346 package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-346-updates package in Ubuntu:
Fix Released
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-331 source package in Trusty:
Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-331-updates source package in Trusty:
Triaged
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 source package in Trusty:
Confirmed
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340-updates source package in Trusty:
Confirmed
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-346 source package in Trusty:
Confirmed
Status in nvidia-graphics-drivers-346-updates source package in Trusty:
Confirmed
Bug description:
Filing this against the 340-updates version but possibly the same
applies to older versions, too. The nvidia source package produces two
individual dkms packages: nvidia-340-updates, nvidia-340-updates-uvm.
The problem is that the DKMS build of the nvidia-uvm module runs
compile steps inside the nvidia modules build directory. This is
violating the DKMS assumption that each module can be build
independently (there is no way of describing cross-modules
dependencies and even more important, the autoinstall step after a new
kernel is installed will run the modules build in parallel).
Since nvidia and nvidia-uvm are very dependent on each other the right
course of action seems to be to combine both sources in one DKMS
module that produces two kernel modules (this is supported by DKMS).
For the transition this resulting dkms package needs to have a
breaks/replaces for the nvidia-uvm package.
Try fedora 21 not 22
Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy S® 6.-------- Original message --------
From: Nima <email address hidden>
Date: 06/19/2015 3:43 AM (GMT-07:00)
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: [Bug 1431753] Re: Nvidia binary driver FTBS due to DKMS layer
violation
I want to go to another linux distribution ,
Can any body give me a hint about it?
CentOS or Opensuse? Which one is better?
which one has a full resource of software like ,for example "ubuntu software center"?
Thanks for any help in advance
-- /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1431753
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
duplicate bug report (1382608).
https:/
Title:
Nvidia binary driver FTBS due to DKMS layer violation
Status in nvidia- graphics- drivers- 331 package in Ubuntu: graphics- drivers- 331-updates package in Ubuntu: graphics- drivers- 340 package in Ubuntu: graphics- drivers- 340-updates package in Ubuntu: graphics- drivers- 346 package in Ubuntu: graphics- drivers- 346-updates package in Ubuntu: graphics- drivers- 331 source package in Trusty: graphics- drivers- 331-updates source package in Trusty: graphics- drivers- 340 source package in Trusty: graphics- drivers- 340-updates source package in Trusty: graphics- drivers- 346 source package in Trusty: graphics- drivers- 346-updates source package in Trusty:
Confirmed
Status in nvidia-
Confirmed
Status in nvidia-
Fix Released
Status in nvidia-
Fix Released
Status in nvidia-
Fix Released
Status in nvidia-
Fix Released
Status in nvidia-
Triaged
Status in nvidia-
Triaged
Status in nvidia-
Confirmed
Status in nvidia-
Confirmed
Status in nvidia-
Confirmed
Status in nvidia-
Confirmed
Bug description: 340-updates- uvm.
Filing this against the 340-updates version but possibly the same
applies to older versions, too. The nvidia source package produces two
individual dkms packages: nvidia-340-updates, nvidia-
The problem is that the DKMS build of the nvidia-uvm module runs
compile steps inside the nvidia modules build directory. This is
violating the DKMS assumption that each module can be build
independently (there is no way of describing cross-modules
dependencies and even more important, the autoinstall step after a new
kernel is installed will run the modules build in parallel).
Since nvidia and nvidia-uvm are very dependent on each other the right
course of action seems to be to combine both sources in one DKMS
module that produces two kernel modules (this is supported by DKMS).
For the transition this resulting dkms package needs to have a
breaks/replaces for the nvidia-uvm package.
To manage notifications about this bug go to: /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ nvidia- graphics- drivers- 331/+bug/ 1431753/ +subscriptions
https:/