Comment 3 for bug 677136
Revision history for this message
| Didier Roche-Tolomelli (didrocks) wrote | #3 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
a60fb26
(Get the code!)
on the symbol file, as told:
Note: the package is using a shlibs file and not a symbol file because the exported symbols are different between arch and nux has a weekly release (with no API/ABI stability), making updating the symbols file quite difficult on every arch before uploading to buildd (only i386 here).
if you want to update it each week, you can (same for armel and such…) :)
* It looks like there is a leftover libnux-dev.install file that can be deleted.
-> oupss, deleted. Thanks!
* The copyright file is formatted incorrectly. I'll attach one that should be right
Hum, ok, I strictly follow the wiki page pointed here. Maybe this one should be fixed. Got your file, thanks!
* The build of code itself is very clean, but when building documentation, there are lots of warnings.
Yeah, doxygen and upstream aren't friend :)
* You mentioned a test suite, but I just see an (essentially) empty tests directory.
It seems to have been removed last week, weird, will check upstream
* on the odditie, can you file a bug upstream, please?
Thanks for the review :)