> I just tested the build, and it succeeds. So I'm uploading Nut 2.4.1-2
> right now, without the build-depends on libpowerman0-dev to ensure that
> this version gets into Jaunty, and so that people can start testing it.
>
ok, so let's go that way. *but* you (the server team) will have less PDUs to
announce (only the SNMP ones present in NUT).
the thing I'm not sure about: removing only the Build-dep should not be
sufficient since the debhelper files for powerman are still there! or did I
got you wrong?
If you want to get it building against that library, please:
> 1) open a new bug (with simple debdiff) asking for this build-depend to be
> added
I will need the 2.4.1-2 source pkg you've uploaded (which removes the
build-dep *and* the debhelper files) before I can do the debdiff...
hey Dustin,
I'll reply directly to that one.
2009/3/3 Dustin Kirkland
> I just tested the build, and it succeeds. So I'm uploading Nut 2.4.1-2
> right now, without the build-depends on libpowerman0-dev to ensure that
> this version gets into Jaunty, and so that people can start testing it.
>
ok, so let's go that way. *but* you (the server team) will have less PDUs to
announce (only the SNMP ones present in NUT).
the thing I'm not sure about: removing only the Build-dep should not be
sufficient since the debhelper files for powerman are still there! or did I
got you wrong?
If you want to get it building against that library, please:
> 1) open a new bug (with simple debdiff) asking for this build-depend to be
> added
I will need the 2.4.1-2 source pkg you've uploaded (which removes the
build-dep *and* the debhelper files) before I can do the debdiff...
> 2) file an MIR for powerman, see: /wiki.ubuntu. com/MainInclusi onReportTemplat e
> https:/
done: https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/MainInclusi onReportPowerma n
3) file an MIR bug for powerman
done: https:/ /launchpad. net/bugs/ 337226
> 4) subscribe me to all of the above and I'll help out :-)
>
done
Arnaud